首页 | 【重要提示】 | 期刊简介 | 编委会 | 在线投稿 | 期刊稿约 | 联系我们

吴文坚,梁裕,张兴凯,曹鹏,郑涛.微创单侧入路双侧减压治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症早期疗效观察[J].脊柱外科杂志,2012,10(3):129-133.
微创单侧入路双侧减压治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症早期疗效观察     点此下载全文 (Fulltext)
吴文坚  梁裕  张兴凯  曹鹏  郑涛
200025 上海, 交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院骨科;200025 上海, 交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院骨科;200025 上海, 交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院骨科;200025 上海, 交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院骨科;200025 上海, 交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院骨科
基金项目:上海市卫生局青年科研项目(2008Y061)
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2957.2012.03.01
摘要点击次数: 1684
全文下载次数: 982
摘要:
      目的 评估微创单侧入路双侧减压经椎间孔椎体间融合术治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症的短期疗效。方法 2010年6~10月,38例腰椎椎管狭窄症患者接受开放或微创手术治疗,微创组17例,开放组21例。记录手术时间、术中出血量和引流量、术后住院时间、并发症情况以及手术前后的腰痛视觉模拟量表(visual analog scale,VAS)评分及日本骨科学会(Japanese Orthopaedic Association,JOA)评分。结果 平均随访7.6个月。微创组平均出血量较少,手术时间较长,而术后住院时间较短。2组患者术后腰痛及功能均有显著改善,微创组末次随访时腰痛VAS评分低于开放组,微创组术后、随访时JOA评分及JOA改善率均明显高于开放组。微创组患者并发症发生率略高于开放组但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 微创单侧入路双侧减压结合微创经椎间孔椎体间融合术治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症短期疗效满意,其长期疗效有待进一步随访明确。
关键词:腰椎  椎管狭窄  减压术,外科  外科手术,微创性
Preliminary results of minimally invasive bilateral decompression via unilateral approach in the treatment of lumbar canal stenosis    Fulltext
WU Wen-jian  LIANG Yu  ZHANG Xing-kai  CAO Peng  ZHENG Tao
Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China;Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China;Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China;Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China;Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
Fund Project:
Abstract:
      Objective To investigate the clinical results of minimally invasive bilateral decompression via unilateral approach in the treatment of lumbar canal stenosis. Methods From June to October 2010, 38 cases of lumbar canal stenosis were treated with open or minimally invasive surgery. Seventeen cases were treated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and 21 cases with open surgery.The mean operating time, blood loss and drainage volume, postoperative hospitalization, complications, pre-and postoperative scores of visual analog scale (VAS) back pain and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) were recorded. Results Mean duration of follow-up was 7.6 months. The MIS group had less blood loss, longer operating time and shorter postoperative hospitalization. Back pain and function of both groups were significantly improved after surgery; the MIS group had less back pain at the final follow-up; the JOA scores and the JOA recovery rate of the MIS group after surgery and at the final follow-up were higher than that of the open group. The incidence of complications of MIS group was slightly higher than the open group without significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion The preliminary results of minimally invasive bilateral decompression via unilateral approach in the treatment of lumbar canal stenosis is satisfactory and further research is needed to determine its long-term results.
Keywords:Lumbar vertebrae  Spinal stenosis  Decompression, surgical  Surgical procedures, minimally invasive
HTML   查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器

您是第4566502位访问者

版权所有 © 脊柱外科杂志    沪ICP备19030205号-1  沪期出证第1907号

地址:上海市成都北路500号峻岭广场 电子信箱:spinejournal@163.com
邮政编码:200003 电话:021-33300675,021-63609919转8537或8855 传真:

本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计