首页 | 【重要提示】 | 期刊简介 | 编委会 | 在线投稿 | 期刊稿约 | 联系我们

何秦,曹凡伟,李俊,张东,沈昌焕.经Wiltse入路与后正中入路治疗腰椎椎间盘突出症的疗效比较[J].脊柱外科杂志,2017,15(5):274-278.
经Wiltse入路与后正中入路治疗腰椎椎间盘突出症的疗效比较     点此下载全文 (Fulltext)
何秦  曹凡伟  李俊  张东  沈昌焕
达州市中心医院骨科, 四川 635000
基金项目:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2957.2017.05.004
摘要点击次数: 818
全文下载次数: 480
摘要:
      目的 比较Wiltse入路与后正中入路治疗腰椎椎间盘突出症(LDH)的疗效。方法 收集2012年1月-2015年12月在本院行手术治疗的LDH患者85例,其中经Wiltse入路43例(A组),传统后正中入路42例(B组)。记录2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量及住院天数等资料;采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分评价患者腰痛和下肢痛,采用Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评价患者功能状况,采用日本骨科学会(JOA)评分评价患者腰椎功能。结果 A组患者在术中出血量、术后引流量、住院天数、术后腰痛VAS评分方面优于B组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);2组手术时间、术后下肢痛VAS评分、ODI及JOA评分差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。术后随访6个月、2年,A组腰痛VAS评分优于B组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论 采用Wiltse入路治疗LDH在降低手术创伤、减少住院天数、减少术后腰痛、减少残留神经功能后遗症等方面均优于传统后正中入路,临床值得推广。
关键词:腰椎  椎间盘移位  内固定器  外科手术,微创性
Wiltse approach versus posterior midline approach surgery for lumbar disc herniation    Fulltext
HE Qin  CAO Fan-wei  LI Jun  ZHANG Dong  SHEN Chang-huan
Department of Orthopaedics, Dazhou Central Hospital, Dazhou 635000, Sichuan, China
Fund Project:
Abstract:
      Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of the Wiltse approach versus posterior midline approach for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Methods From January 2012 to December 2015,85 patients with lumbar disc herniation were enrolled according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups according to operative approach,Wiltse approach as group A(n=43) and posterior midline approach as group B(n=42). The hospital stay,operative time,blood loss and postoperative drainage were recorded. The low back pain and leg pain of the patients were evaluated by visual analogue scale(VAS),the disability status was evaluated by Oswestry disability index(ODI),and the low back disability improvement rate was calculated by Japanese Orthopaedics Association(JOA) score. Results Group A was superior to the group B in length of stay,blood loss,postoperative drainage,and postoperative low back pain VAS score,and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). There were no statistical differences in operation time,postoperative leg pain VAS score,ODI and JOA score(P > 0.05). Group A were superior to group B in low back pain VAS scores at 6-month and 2-year follow-up,with statistical significance(P < 0.05). Conclusion Wiltse approach is superior to conventional approach in minimally invasion,reducing hospital stay,reducing postoperative lower back pain and reducing the disability,thus being worth spreading in clinical use.
Keywords:Lumbar vertebrae  Intervertebral disk displacement  Internal fixators  Surgical procedures,minimally invasive
HTML   查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器

您是第4559725位访问者

版权所有 © 脊柱外科杂志    沪ICP备19030205号-1  沪期出证第1907号

地址:上海市成都北路500号峻岭广场 电子信箱:spinejournal@163.com
邮政编码:200003 电话:021-33300675,021-63609919转8537或8855 传真:

本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计