首页 | 【重要提示】 | 期刊简介 | 编委会 | 在线投稿 | 期刊稿约 | 联系我们

刘佐忠,黄黎黎,邵高海,李波,邓忠良.不同术式治疗腰椎椎间盘突出症的疗效对比[J].脊柱外科杂志,2021,19(2):100-104,115.
不同术式治疗腰椎椎间盘突出症的疗效对比     点此下载全文 (Fulltext)
刘佐忠1  黄黎黎1*  邵高海1  李波1  邓忠良2
1. 重庆医科大学附属永川医院骨科, 重庆 402160;
2. 重庆医科大学附属第二医院骨科, 重庆 400010
基金项目:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2957.2021.02.006
摘要点击次数: 772
全文下载次数: 254
摘要:
      目的 比较经皮内窥镜下腰椎椎间盘切除术(PELD)、后路显微内窥镜下椎间盘切除术(MED)及后路小切口椎间盘切除术(MD)治疗腰椎椎间盘突出症(LDH)的疗效。方法 回顾性分析2016年8月—2018年10月在重庆医科大学附属永川医院接受手术治疗的96例LDH患者临床资料,按照手术方式分为PELD组、MED组和MD组,每组32例,记录并比较3组手术时间,切口长度,透视次数,术中出血量,术后卧床时间,住院时间,术后3 d血清肌酸磷酸激酶(CPK)水平,术后1 d、3 d切口疼痛程度,术前、术后1个月、术后12个月腰腿痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分及Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)。采用改良MacNab标准评估疗效,观察并发症发生情况。结果 PELD组在切口长度、术后卧床时间、住院时间、术后3 d CPK水平及术后1 d、3 d伤口疼痛程度方面优于MED组,而MED组优于MD组;术中出血量PELD组< MED组< MD组;上述指标组间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PELD组手术时间长于其他2组,透视次数显著多于其他2组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);MED组与MD组手术时间、透视次数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组术后1个月、12个月腰痛及腿痛VAS评分、ODI较术前明显改善,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后所有病例腿痛缓解较腰痛缓解更为明显。末次随访时3组间疗效优良率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组均无严重并发症发生,轻微并发症经术中、术后对症处理后改善。结论 3种手术方式均为治疗LDH的有效方案,PELD最为微创,符合快速康复理念,对于外侧型及旁侧型LDH具有明显优势,而中央型LDH采用MED治疗为宜。
关键词:腰椎  椎间盘移位  内窥镜检查  椎间盘切除术,经皮  外科手术,微创性
Efficacy comparison of different surgical methods for lumbar disc herniation    Fulltext
Liu Zuozhong1  Huang Lili1*  Shao Gaohai1  Li Bo1  Deng Zhongliang2
1. Department of Orthopeadics, Yongchuan Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 402160, China;
2. Department of Orthopeadics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
Fund Project:
Abstract:
      Objective To compare the efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy(PELD),posterior micro-endoscopic discectomy(MED) and posterior micro-discectomy(MD) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation(LDH). Methods The clinical data of 96 patients with LDH in Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from August 2016 to October 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the surgical method,patients were divided into PELD group,MED group and MD group,32 cases in each group. Operation time,incision length,fluoroscopy frequency,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative in bed time,hospital stay,serum creatine phosphokinase(CPK) level at postoperative 3 d,incision pain at postoperative 1 and 3 d,visual analogue scale(VAS) score and Oswestry disability index(ODI) at pre-operation,postoperative 1 month and 12 months were recorded and compared between the 3 groups. The modified MacNab criteral was used to evaluate the clinical efficacy,and the incidence of complications were observed. Results The incision length,postoperative in bed time,hospital stay,CPK level at postoperative 3 d and incision pain at postoperative 1 and 3 d in PELD group were superior to those in MED group,while MED group was superior to MD group;in intraoperative blood loss,PELD group < MED group < MD group;the pairwise differences of the above indicators were statistically significant between the 3 groups(P<0.05). The operation time of PELD group was longer than that of the other 2 groups,and the fluoroscopy frequency was significantly higher than that of the other 2 groups,all with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in operation time and fluoroscopy frequency between MED group and MD group(P>0.05). The VAS score of low back pain and leg pain and ODI were significantly improved in the 3 groups at postoperative 1 month and 12 months,all with a statistical signifiance(P<0.05);the difference between the 3 groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05);the relief of leg pain was more obvious than the low back pain in all the cases. At the final follow-up,there was no significant difference in the excellent and good rate of efficacy between the 3 groups(P<0.05). No serious complications occurred in the 3 groups,and minor complications were improved after symptomatic treatment during and after the operation. Conclusions All the 3 surgical methods are effective for the treatment of LDH. PELD is the most minimally invasive,in line with the concept of rapid rehabilitation,thus having obvious advantages for the lateral and paracentral LDH,while the central LDH should be treated with MED.
Keywords:Lumbar vertebrae  Intervertebral disc displacement  Endoscopy  Diskectomy,percutaneous  Surgical procedures,minimally invasive
HTML   查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器

您是第4635054位访问者

版权所有 © 脊柱外科杂志    沪ICP备19030205号-1  沪期出证第1907号

地址:上海市成都北路500号峻岭广场 电子信箱:spinejournal@163.com
邮政编码:200003 电话:021-33300675,021-63609919转8537或8855 传真:

本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计