首页 | 【重要提示】 | 期刊简介 | 编委会 | 在线投稿 | 期刊稿约 | 联系我们

王宇,孔超,鲁世保,海涌,藏磊,康南,孟祥龙.经伤椎单节段与跨伤椎短节段固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效对比[J].脊柱外科杂志,2013,11(3):141-145.
经伤椎单节段与跨伤椎短节段固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效对比     点此下载全文 (Fulltext)
王宇  孔超  鲁世保  海涌  藏磊  康南  孟祥龙
100020 北京, 首都医科大学附属朝阳医院骨科;100020 北京, 首都医科大学附属朝阳医院骨科;100020 北京, 首都医科大学附属朝阳医院骨科;100020 北京, 首都医科大学附属朝阳医院骨科;100020 北京, 首都医科大学附属朝阳医院骨科;100020 北京, 首都医科大学附属朝阳医院骨科;100020 北京, 首都医科大学附属朝阳医院骨科
基金项目:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2957.2013.03.004
摘要点击次数: 856
全文下载次数: 0
摘要:
      目的 比较经伤椎单节段固定与跨伤椎短节段固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2008年8月~2011年8月采用经伤椎单节段(A组)与跨伤椎短节段(B组)椎弓根钉内固定治疗并获12个月以上随访的65例胸腰椎骨折患者,分别在术前、术后3 d和随访末期时测量伤椎以及其上下相邻正常椎体的前缘高度、矢状面Cobb角,观察术后伤椎椎体前缘高度比和矢状面Cobb角改善情况,以及末次随访时的矫正度(包括伤椎高度矫正度和Cobb角矫正度)丢失情况,同时比较2种手术的手术时间、手术出血量。结果 有65例患者影像学资料完整且获得了12个月以上的随访,平均随访时间21.6个月(12~46个月)。术后2组患者椎体前缘高度及Cobb角均获得显著恢复,但末次随访时A组对椎体前缘高度和矢状面Cobb角的保持优于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组手术时间和手术出血量之间差异无统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 对于胸腰椎骨折,经伤椎单节段固定术和跨伤椎短节段固定术都能较好的恢复椎体高度和矢状面Cobb角,但经伤椎单节段固定术对术后矫正度的保持优于跨伤椎短节段固定术。
关键词:胸椎  腰椎  脊柱骨折  内固定器
Comparison of clinical outcomes of mono-segmental internal fixation between through and across injured vertebrae for thoracolumbar fracture    Fulltext
WANG Yu  KONG Chao  LU Shi-bao  HAI Yong  ZANG Lei  KANG Nan  MENG Xiang-long
Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100039, China;Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100039, China;Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100039, China;Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100039, China;Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100039, China;Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100039, China;Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100039, China
Fund Project:
Abstract:
      Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of mono-segmental internal fixation between through and across injured vertebrae for thoracolumbar fracture.Methods A total of 65 patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture who were treated by internal fixation through (Group A) or across (Group B) injured vertebrae from August 2008 to August 2011 and followed up for more than 12 months were involed in this retrospective study. The anterior height of the injured vertebra as well as the adjacent 2 normal vertebrae, and Cobb's angle of the injured vertebra were measured. The compression rate and the loss of correction were calculated at the final follow-up. The operation time and blood loss of the 2 groups were also recorded.Results Sixty-five patients receieved an average of 21.6 months follow-up (12-46 months). The compression rate and the Cobb's angle were significantly restored after the surgery, but Group A had a better maintainance of correction compared with Group B at the final follow-up(P<0.05). The difference of blood loss and duration of operation between 2 groups was not significant(P>0.05).Conclusion For thoracolumbar fractures, mono-segmental internal fixation both through and across injured vertebrae can restore the vertebral height and Cobb's angle well, but mono-segmental internal fixation through injured vertebrae has a better maintainance of correction.
Keywords:Thoracic vertebrae  Lumbar vertebrae  Spinal fractures  Internal fixators
HTML   查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器

您是第4634926位访问者

版权所有 © 脊柱外科杂志    沪ICP备19030205号-1  沪期出证第1907号

地址:上海市成都北路500号峻岭广场 电子信箱:spinejournal@163.com
邮政编码:200003 电话:021-33300675,021-63609919转8537或8855 传真:

本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计